Crypto That Matters
Cut through the noise. See what deserves capital—and who made the better call.
We compare rule-based and AI paper portfolios across crypto, stocks, macro, and Bittensor. Every decision is dated. Every allocator keeps score.
Choose the question
Six places. One consistent answer-first system.
CryptoWhich crypto deserves capital?Crypto House, price-only control, GPT, and Grok.Open →BittensorShould TAO stay liquid or enter subnets?Liquid-TAO House versus subnet allocators, backed by our own node.Open →ZcashDoes ZEC deserve capital?Portfolio conviction, six-pool monetary evidence, and the CYPH instrument.Open →LeadershipWhat is leading across stocks and crypto?Pairwise evidence turned into mechanical and AI portfolios.Open →MacroHow should capital move across cash, stocks, crypto, and TAO?Three cross-asset Mastermind allocators using the full evidence system.Open →BattlefieldWhich allocator is actually winning?Every active portfolio on one disclosed common USD starting line.Open →
How it works
Answer. Compare. Verify.
1. See the portfolio
Current holdings and weights appear before research detail.
2. Compare the allocators
Mechanical rules and independent AI challengers run side by side.
3. Inspect the evidence
Leadership, fundamentals, macro, and decision history remain available on demand.
Free answers. Pro evidence and history.
Current portfolios and public performance are free. Pro opens complete reasoning, falsifiers, uncertainty, and append-only decision vintages. It does not include execution.
See Analytics Pro →